Commercial Litigation FAQ

Please choose from the list of FAQ's below :

Commercial Litigation FAQ#1 - What are Exemplary (punitive) damages and when will the Court award Exemplary (punitive) damages?

Commercial Litigation FAQ#2 - What are Aggravated Damages?

Commercial Litigation FAQ#1 - What are Exemplary (punitive) damages and when will the Court award Exemplary (punitive) damages?
Exemplary (punitive) damages are damages which are intended to punish the defendant. Exemplary damages are awarded on the basis of public policy for conduct which the court believes that the community at large would find distressing or upsetting. The purpose of exemplary damages is to punish the wrongdoer and deter others from similar conduct.

In deciding whether to award exemplary damages, the Court has a wide discretion. The court will look at:
1.the means of the defendant (an award should be able to be 'felt' by the defendant);
2.Whether or not the applicant in any way provoked the defendant's conduct; and
3.the extent of any punishment that has already been inflicted on the defendant.

In working out how much exemplary damages to award the following factors are relevant:
1.The Court should display restraint when assessing the amount of the damages;
2.The Court should be always be aware of the danger of an excessive award of damages
3.Exemplary damages should only be awarded if the court believes that compensative damages awarded do not contain a sufficient element of punitive damages.

CASES:

Rookes v Barnard [1964] UKHL 1; [1964] AC 1129.
This is the primary English case relating to exemplary damages.

In Rookes v Barnard it was held that exemplary damages could be awarded only in three kinds of cases:
- oppressive, arbitrary or unconstitutional acts by government servants;
- where the defendant's conduct had been calculated to make a profit which might well exceed the compensation payable to the plaintiff; and
- where expressly authorised by statute.

Uren v John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd [1966] HCA 40; (1966) 117 CLR 118
FACTS: The appellant, a Federal Minister brought an action against John Fairfax Pty Ltd for defamation in relation to an article published by them in the Sun herald.
HELD: Exemplary damages must always be based upon something more substantial than a jury's mere disapproval of the conduct of a defendant. Exemplary damages can apply only where the conduct of the defendant merits punishment, which is only considered to be so where his or her conduct is wanton, where it discloses fraud, malice, violence, cruelty, insolence or the like, or, where he or she acts in complete disregard of the plaintiff's rights." The High Court disagreed with the limitations placed on the awarding of exemplary damaged in Rookes v Barnard (above)

Gray v Motor Accident Commission [1998] HCA 70; 196 CLR 1; 158 ALR 485; 73 ALJR 45 (17 November 1998)
FACTS: The appellant was seriously injured when he was struck by a motor car driven at him deliberately. The driver was convicted of causing grievous bodily harm with intent to cause grievous bodily harm and was sentenced to seven years' imprisonment.
The appellant commenced an action against the driver claiming damages for personal injury. The action was framed as a claim for damages for negligence.
The trial judge assessed the appellant's damages at $72,206 comprising $15,000 for past economic loss, $30,000 for future economic loss, $18,190 for what is called in s 35A of the Wrongs Act 1936 (SA) "non-economic loss" and $9,016 for special damages. The trial judge made no award of exemplary damages. He held that because the driver had already been punished in the criminal court, it was not appropriate to award exemplary damages.
HELD: Appeal allowed.. Damages may be recovered whatever the subjective intention of the tortfeasor if, objectively, the conduct involved was high-handed, calling for judicial condemnation addressed not only to the tortfeasor but to the world.

Back to top

Commercial Litigation FAQ#2 - What are Aggravated Damages?
Aggravated damages are awarded to compensate the applicant for suffering caused by non-financial losses. They are measured by the applicant's suffering. The Court looks at the such things as the applicant’s pain, anguish, grief, humiliation, wounded pride, damaged self-confidence or self-esteem, loss of faith in friends or colleagues, and similar matters. To be awarded aggravated damages the suffering of the applicant needs to be caused by the conduct of the defendant.

When assessing whether or not to award aggravated damages the following principles apply:
1.The distress suffered by the applicant must be significant in depth, or duration, or both.
2.The distress must represent a significant influence on the plaintiff's life
3.There must be actual evidence of aggravation of the applicant’s distress
4.No one rule as to damages can be adopted to fit every case - as the circumstances differ, so must the rule.
5.The defendant’s behaviour must go beyond mere negligence. The defendant’s behaviour must be “wanton, reckless or outrageous”.

CASES:

Carson v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd & Slee [1993] HCA 31; (1993) 178 CLR 44 (16 June 1993)
FACTS: The Appellant commenced proceedings seeking damages for defamation following an article written in the Sydney Morning Herald. The initial trial was a jury trial.
HELD: Appeal dismissed but the Court held that it is of the utmost importance that juries should be instructed that any award of aggravated damages must be confined to what is truly compensation for the relevant harm and must not include any element of punitive damages. The trial judge must give a clear and firm instruction to the jury that, in considering the plaintiff's claim, the damages must not exceed the amount appropriate to compensate the plaintiff for any relevant harm he or she has suffered.

Lamb v Cotogno [1987] HCA 47; (1987) 164 CLR 1
FACTS:The defendant entered the property of the appellant to serve a summons. As he drove away, the appellant grabbed on to the front of the defendants car. The defendant kept driving and the appellant eventually fell off, suffering broken ankles and other injuries..
HELD:Appeal dismissed. The court distinguished between aggravated and exemplary damages, saying aggravated damages are compensatory in nature, being awarded for injury to the plaintiff's feelings caused by insult, humiliation and the like. Exemplary damages go beyond compensation and are awarded as a punishment to the guilty, to deter from any such proceeding for the future, and as a proof of the detestation of the jury to the action itself.

Please note that our provision of any telephone advice to you is only a general discussion to assist as to whether you wish to instruct us. Telephone discussions should not be construed as legal advice and are not to be relied upon. Legal advice which you can rely on can only be properly provided by us to you at or following an initial conference. We are not responsible for any action you may take or fail to take based upon the provision of our telephone advice to you. If you wish to arrange a conference, please contact us.

Online enquiry form

Watson & Watson are always available to provide expert legal advice and answer any questions you may have.

Name:	*
Email:	*
Phone:	*

Please send me advice on:

Building & Construction Law
Family Law
Commercial Litigation
Conveyancing
Criminal Law
Insolvency/Bankruptcy
Wills & Probate

Comments:

Recent Cases

Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act - 30/09/2010

Adjudicator’s decision is now able to be challenged for jurisdictional error in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court, Court of Appeal in September 2010 held that a decision of an adjudicator...

Testimonials

7/11/2011

Many thanks for all your support in securing our unit. We very much appreciate your help. Kind Regards.
- M & C, Hills District

1/11/2011

Absolutely fabulous Lelien, we are definitely keen on this strategy. Very happy with your process so far. Many thanks again.
- R.E, Sydney

9/10/2011

"Thank you for your email and effort to help me... I do not know what I would have done without you."
- K.S, Byron Bay

2/10/2011

"Thanks for yesterday, great advice and some more clarity in my mind on how we will be proceeding."
- P.B, Sydney

29/09/2011

"Richard. Many thanks. We are very appreciative of the professional assistance given to us in relation to our claim for defective building works. With your professional help we were able to come to a satisfactory resolution to our long standing problem"
- J.H, Gosford

20/09/2011

"Many thanks for all the work & effort you have done to help us secure our unit. We very much appreciate the time you have taken."
- M.C, Sydney

22/07/2011

"I am personally grateful for the effort put into this by all concerned. I do believe the issues have been thoroughly aired and we can now finalise the matter."
- J.T, Sydney

18/07/2011

"To Chris Jefferies,
We wish to thank you for the efficiency you have displayed in the Conciliation Conference and for settling the matter for us."
- Holden Barlow Solicitors, Perth

28/06/2011

"Thanks again for all your help. You've been an absolute delight to deal with."
-B.M, Sydney

3/06/2011

"Dennis, Thank you for your advice and taking my case in this matter. Peter has spoken so highly of you."
- S.Y, Sydney

26/05/2011

"Dear Dennis,
Wonderful news!
Thank you kindly for your great work, I am so very pleased and thrilled with the result.
My life is so much brighter and we can stay here in Australia.
All my family are grateful and so happy."
- L.S, Sydney

25/05/2011

"I would also like to acknowledge all Dennis' expertise and hard work."
- P.L, Sydney

17/05/2011

"Just to say a big thank you for today! I am delighted with the result."
- J.M, Eastern Suburbs

11/05/2011

"Dennis,

I am writing to send my deepest thanks for yesterday's outcome. Your efforts in pressing the case have been nothing short of magnificent.

I have been (in part) of a mind set that defeat and rejection was to be my soul mate on this issue. But yesterday's fine transition from nothing to something is such an incredibley happy outcome. Your considered opinitions, general care and legwork, as a commmiteed and compassionate advocate will stick as a life long memory. I feel extremely fortunate and proud of what has been achieved.

I understand too, with the joy comes the responsibility. The message of dilligence is not lost and is branded into the forefront of my mind.

Yours in sincere thanks."
- D.G, Sydney

11/05/2011

"Excellent! Progress. The ball is in your court. Congratulations."
- M.D, Sydney

4/05/2011

"Despite trying very hard to come to amicable agreement we found ourselves in the dreadful position of constant intimidation correspondence from the solicitors of the buildings who undertook residential renovations. As a result I instructed Richard Watson to act in the matter. It turned out that having a firm of solicitors highly experienced and qualified in the very complex area of building law proved essential and indeed saved the day. This together with their kindness and open and honest frankness made something that was looking impossible into a great success."
- M.N, Eastern Suburbs

21/04/2011

"The letters to the solicitors on the other side are perfect. Please send it."
- C.F, Lower North Shore

20/04/2011

"Thank you very much for you have done job for me!"
-S.L Parramatta

31/03/2011

"We greatly appreciate the efficiency and also the time to see us the Tuesday night before we exchanged contracts. We moved in on the weekend and are very happy."
- PB-H, Lower North Shore

29/03/2011

"I appreciate the professional assistance given."
- D.D, South West Suburbs

4/03/2011

"You have been wonderful and worth every penny."
- P.H, Canada

4/03/2011

"I'd just like to say a big thank you!
I appreciate your help and patience throughout."
- J.F, Eastern Suburbs

21/01/2011

"Thank you, thank you, thank you."
- Z.H, Sydney City

1/12/2010

"I found myself in a difficult situation and was fortunate to engage Richard Watson of Watson & Watson. Richard helped explain the options and alternatives available to me and the likely outcomes having regard to all matters to be taken into account. Richard helped me come to a very satisfactory resolution of the matters and as a result I have been able to secure accommodation for myself and children in the local district in a relatively short period of time. In addition to the advice as to the various alternatives, options and likely outcomes I found Richard caring.

Throughout when things were difficult Richard was a steady influence so that I could achieve the optimum outcome for all concerned. I recommend Watson & Watson for any other person in similar circumstances. "
-S.J.G Cremorne

1/11/2010

"Just would to wish you a very Merry Christmas. I will never forget your kindness and generosity - and strength at times I feel you worked with the mighty Lord - quite testifying!
I have so much gained from the experience in many ways."
Best Wishes and Many Regards,
-R.L

1/08/2010

"Hi Richard ,
This is just a brief note of thanks for taking care of me through this horrible situation.
I know you are a pro but for those of us that are faced with the reality... it's scary & sad. "
Best Regards,
-D.T

1/08/2010

"I was in a position that I had exchanged on the purchase of a property and I had agreement from my ex for funding the purchase, however, after I exchanged to purchase, my ex changed his verbal agreement. I came to Watson & Watson as my daughter had received a very good outcome with understanding. Watson & Watson in a very short period of time achieved a cost effective settlement which allowed me to complete my purchase. Their experience relating to various alternatives gave me other alternatives and allowed me to conclude the finalization of the property matter with my ex and the purchase of the property in a very short period of time and to my utmost satisfaction."
-K.S Leura

1/07/2010

"Watson & Watson have performed exceptionally in a cost effective manner for the Bank for in excess of 20 years and never recovered less than expectations. Their work is professional, cost effective and always above expectations. In all my years with Watson & Watson the Bank has only lost one case and that was the first case in which I was at the Bank instructing another solicitor for the Bank and Watson & Watson acted for the customer against the Bank, our solicitor lost, Watson & Watson acting for the customer against the Bank WON."

"I have been instructing legal firms in relation to litigation and recovery actions for the Bank for more than 20 years. Richard Watson and his team are result driven. The costs on a case by case basis is significantly less than other firms which I instruct from time to time on behalf of the Bank."
-H.B Bank Sydney

1/06/2010

"Dear Richard,,
Many thanks for all that you have done.
It is been a fantastic result."
Thank you
Best Wishes"
-R.L Surry Hills

31/05/2010

"My family bought property in the 1950's and registered it in the name of my brother. My brother assumed ownership of the property. Nothing was done until Richard Watson became involved and the matter was settled with a substantial payment to me, more than doubling my ample wealth."
-L.S Canberra

1/05/2010

"I was concerned as to the costs of the process. Watson & Watson are focused on results and means by which I could provide information required which assisted in a cost effective resolution. Watson & Watson assisted in identifying the issues, alternatives and options and what was the best way to resolution."
-R.B

1/02/2010

"I went to two other solicitors and then Watson & Watson before making a decision. Watson & Watson raised issues that other solicitors had not thought of. Richard Watson explained clearly issues relating to spousal maintenance that may arise now and in the future and a method of protection from future claims. Not only did Watson & Watson deal with the immediate needs but took steps relating to protection in the future and advice in relation to estate and other matters following the break up of my relationship. I have recommended Watson & Watson for others int he unfortunate position of break up of their relationship."
-A.L Pymble

+ Read more testimonials